Supplier
Assessment
Check every supplier
against the same requirements.
Supplier questionnaires, certificates, quality agreements, audit reports and corrective-action records arrive in different formats. AskDona Assessment reads them against your supplier requirements and returns, requirement by requirement, a first-pass judgment, the passage it rests on, and what is still missing, for your quality team to review.
The documents arrive. But checking them against every requirement takes time.
Qualifying a supplier, or re-evaluating one, means reading what they send (questionnaires, certificates, quality agreements, audit reports, corrective-action responses) and deciding whether each requirement is met.
Every supplier answers in its own format. A certificate may have lapsed, a questionnaire answer may not match the audit report, and the evidence that a corrective action was closed may never have been attached. Finding that means reading everything, every time.
Aren't you repeating these checks, supplier by supplier and requirement by requirement?
AskDona Assessment
Take assessments into an era
you run together with an AI agent.
Evaluations once done one at a time, by hand —
now run all at once by an AI agent, grounded in the evidence.
AskDona Assessment shows not just the judgment, but the evidence behind it, and what is missing.
Register your supplier requirements (from your purchasing procedure, quality agreement or audit checklist) and the documents each supplier submitted. For every requirement, an AI agent prepares a first-pass judgment with the reason, the passage it relies on, and any missing information.
Instead of reading every submission from scratch, your quality team reviews what was found, follows up on the gaps, and decides. The final judgment, and the record of it, stay with your experts.
For each requirement, a list of what reviewers need.
| Output | What your quality team can confirm |
|---|---|
| Requirement | The supplier requirement being assessed, as your team defined it |
| Judgment | Satisfied, not satisfied, cannot determine, or needs follow-up |
| Reason | Why the evidence does or does not meet the requirement |
| Evidence | The passage quoted from the supplier's document, with its file and page |
| Dates and scope | The validity dates and scope the documents state, for the reviewer to check |
| Discrepancies | Where answers differ between documents, such as a questionnaire and an audit report |
| Missing information | Evidence that still has to be requested from the supplier |
| Review points | Where your reviewer should look first |
すべてのサプライヤーを、
同じ基準で。 Every supplier,
checked the same way.
お手元のサプライヤー書類でお試しください。Try it on the supplier documents you already hold.
Frequently asked questions
Supplier questionnaires, certificates, quality agreements, audit reports, corrective-action responses and other records you register, in formats such as PDF, Word and Excel. Your team defines the requirements they are checked against.
No. It prepares a first-pass assessment with the evidence and the gaps for each requirement. Approving, conditionally approving or disqualifying a supplier remains your quality team's decision.
Yes. Register your existing supplier requirements, checklist or questionnaire as they are. There is no need to rebuild them.
The requirement is marked for follow-up, with what could not be found, rather than treated as met. A document that was not found is not treated as proof that the supplier lacks a control either; your reviewer decides what to request.
Yes. Run the same requirements against the updated documents at each re-evaluation, so every supplier is checked the same way each time.